search
arrow-left Previous
Next arrow-right
Q: Which of the following statements are correct regarding the Supreme Court judgement on validity of 103rd Constitutional Amendment Act? A. The Supreme Court of India’s Constitutional Bench for this case consisted of 5 judges. B. The Constitutional Bench upholds the 10% of EWS reservation with 3-2 majority. C. As per the Supreme Court judgment, the 103rd Constitutional Amendment is valid although it is violating the Basic Structure of the Indian Constitution.
  • A. Only B and C
  • B. A, B and C
  • C. Only A and C
  • D. Only A and B
Correct Answer: Option D - The Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court of India (judges number 5) has upheld 10% of EWS reservation with a majority of 3-2 on the validity of the 103rd Constitution Amendment Act 2019. The Court ruled that the 10% reservation for economically weaker general sections does not violate any feature of the Constitution nor does it violate the basic structure of the Indian Constitution.
D. The Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court of India (judges number 5) has upheld 10% of EWS reservation with a majority of 3-2 on the validity of the 103rd Constitution Amendment Act 2019. The Court ruled that the 10% reservation for economically weaker general sections does not violate any feature of the Constitution nor does it violate the basic structure of the Indian Constitution.

Explanations:

The Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court of India (judges number 5) has upheld 10% of EWS reservation with a majority of 3-2 on the validity of the 103rd Constitution Amendment Act 2019. The Court ruled that the 10% reservation for economically weaker general sections does not violate any feature of the Constitution nor does it violate the basic structure of the Indian Constitution.