search
arrow-left Previous
Next arrow-right
Q: The Constitution of India does NOT consider ––––––– as a part of the Union Executive.
  • A. Advocate-General of State
  • B. Vice president
  • C. Prime Minister of India and her/his Council of Ministers
  • D. President of India
Correct Answer: Option A - The Advocate-General is the highest law officer in the state. Article 165 deals with the Advocate-General of the state. He is responsible to assist the state government in all its legal matter. The Governor of each state shall appoint a person who is qualified to be appointed as a Judge of a High Court to be the Advocate-General for the state. He is the part of State Executive. Hence, the Constitution of India does not consider Advocate-General of state as part of the Union Executive.
A. The Advocate-General is the highest law officer in the state. Article 165 deals with the Advocate-General of the state. He is responsible to assist the state government in all its legal matter. The Governor of each state shall appoint a person who is qualified to be appointed as a Judge of a High Court to be the Advocate-General for the state. He is the part of State Executive. Hence, the Constitution of India does not consider Advocate-General of state as part of the Union Executive.

Explanations:

The Advocate-General is the highest law officer in the state. Article 165 deals with the Advocate-General of the state. He is responsible to assist the state government in all its legal matter. The Governor of each state shall appoint a person who is qualified to be appointed as a Judge of a High Court to be the Advocate-General for the state. He is the part of State Executive. Hence, the Constitution of India does not consider Advocate-General of state as part of the Union Executive.